TOWN OF
PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES
Approved
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
PRESENT: Co-Chairman Brian Sullivan, Co-Chairman Andrew Fairbanks, Recorder
Heather Loewy NicholsAlternate Member William Condra,
David Dreysher, Secretary , and NRPC Rep.
The agenda was amended to the following:
1.)
Barrett Mountain LLC – Subdivision
2.)
John E. Kukulka – Site Plan Review
3.)
E.J. Abbot Trust – Subdivision
4.)
Dorothy S. McGettigan Revocable Trust – Subdivision
5.)
First Light Farm, LLC – Cluster Subdivision
6.)
Craig Checani – Site Plan Review
7.)
8.)
Provost 1993 Trust – Subdivision
9.)
Change of Agenda Schedule
10.)
Joseph M. Wichert – Subdivision Application
11.)
Adjournment
ABSENT: Alternate Member Bill Condra, and Alternate Member
David Holder
OTHERS: Wilton Planning Board
Minutes
2/21/07
Co-
Chairman 80 p.m. opening
with the announcement that Jeff Kandt is sitting as an
alternate on
the Board and newly voted member David Dreysher would be observing at this
meeting before being sworn in as a voting member. p.m.
CONTINUATIONS:
1.)
Subdivision –
Barrett Mountain LLC –
Present: Alec MacMartin, Matt Fish, Brian Sullivan,
Andrew Fairbanks, Dan Donovan, Jeff Kandt, NRPC Rep Steve Wagner, Neil FaimanFairman
Called to order 7:38 pm
Bill Davidson appeared before the Board, for , stating that he was here to update the Board on
their progress.
Subdivision – Barrett Mountain LLC 7:44-
Bill Davidson from Meridian Services, stepping in
for Chad BrannonBRanner,
Basically an updateHe explained , working on legalthat Meridian’s attorney, Carolyn Owen and Town Council have been passing papers back and forth with minor
changes and s, Silas got
back to the ateornry, she made his revisions and sent
them back today, monir stuff, he imagined that the issues would be resovledresolved by the next Planning Board meeting. He noted that he added , on this
plan added Note 19 with
reference to , last time here looking for an industrial use
only and Note 16 was expanded as requested to address Spencer Brooks’ concerns
about note, Spencer had an issue on the a pedestrian
easement. , Note 16
was expanded to take that into account,He stated that the plans had been reviewed by received
review from Steve Wagner who, mentioned the
issue of an of obond foffsite improvement agreement with the
Selectman however he, did not know what those
improvements would be. Bill, assumed that
theseis would be dealt withone when the individual
site plans were received since, each one of these lots will
come back with whatever site plan is required depending on by the end user. , Dan Donavan agreed with Bill’s plan of procedure and stated that he, does not
think that esn’t see
that there would be anyany off-sitesiute improvements will be
needed as the
properties are s due to it
being oon a state road but suggested that a , maybe note statingthat says that offsite improvements will
be assessed upon site plans might be
appropriate., Bill questioned the procedure for the
Rroad boand estimate and the
Board stated that traditionally it comes , planning on putting it
together and , board says traditional comes tthrough the
board and is then is reviewed by the Sselectman and
the Ttown Eengineer. Bill stated
that they will rr
Road bounds, set the corners
and then set the road bounds after the road has been constructedion all of which, would be included in the road
bond estimate., once set
lot corners would be done by before approva from this board, They also discussed that even though
Steve Wagner
made has a mention of
filing NOI and SWPPPSWIFT plan before
construction on his review there , does not need to be aa note on the plan appeared before the Board with his final plans of
the Barrett Mountain Subdivision. He
stated all outstanding items had been addressed. Now that the easements have
been removed as voted in the annual town meeting, and the road bond had
been agreed upon between the town engineer and the applicant,
A MOTION was
made by Dan
Voting: 6 ayes; motion carried.
.
Still some back and forth with Silas, yes but will
be taken care, seem minor, done by next meeting for sure, Carolyn Owne &
Silas,
Steve- leave that the board walks the bounds or put
a note for a surveryour,
Leave that the board walks the bound and leave into
the
Will note the bounds after
Bounds are not in but will call the board, After some discussion about where the bounds meet the river, Bill stated that Meridian will put permanent
markers up where the properties meet the
easement and grade stakes in between the permanent marker so that
Conservation Committee will be able to place their placards.
Dan Donoavaan suggested that Bill - might want to verify with Peggy
about the Warrant Article as the , The Sselectman revieweds warrant articles the other
evening and he and he
doesn does not ’t remember the article
in question.it
Spencer, someone from WCC should be there to walk
the bounds, concerened that the future owners of the property will not know
that there is an easement there and , would need to put stakes on the bounds
and then the conservation committee could but there signs 10 feet in,
He can put stakes on the property lines and then
make sure that Spencer will be able to locate with the
Alec MacMartin volunteeredwill to walk the bounds and call
Spencer when they are ready. when he calls saying that the bounds are in call,
board will call SpencerSoencers
Discussed grade stakes versus grade stakes – he
will put permanent markers where ewach of the properties cross the easement and
put grade stakes in between so Spencer can follow for his signagre,
The floor was opened for public comment. There was
none.
No public comment
A MOTION was made by Alex MacMartin andAlec MacMartin and SECONDED by Motion to continue to next meetingAndrew Fairbanks t
1.) Bounds to be walked.o continue the application to the next meeting., MacMartin,
Fairbank,
Voting: 657
ayes;,
motion carried.
There was no further discussion on the matter.
2.) John
avan stepped off the Board as voting members. William Condra is a voting member of the
Board for the remainder of the meeting.
FaimanFariman and Donavan resigned,
Bill
Davidson, of from
Meridian, reappeared before the Board with passed out revised plans and explained
that the, last two
times he was before the Board they had there was discussiondiscussed the best about density for this
site, noting that his firm
had, decided
that the density for th decided on
two 36’ by 36’ units.is lot is
two units, 36’ by 36’, probably larger footprint then what is going to be built
for He explained that, he is unsure of the actually
foot print of the units at this time. He also noted that , adjacent to the
units will be a is a four bay
garage with, two bays for
each unit and , added additional parking space at the existing house.e, He noted that about 75’ in
from the road there is a pavement line where the
pavement would end and the , propoased pavement would end, driveway and
parking would be gravel. He noted
that this revised plan would include the, same culvert, the still have
a retention basin, a , reduced amount the of landscaping that had originally,, and now would
include an 8%$ impervious
cover. The Board discussed different options for the
parking including an island between
each unit’s parking spaces.,
Seems like a lot of parking spaces, basically the
36’ feet long, storage will be a premiumum because there will be no basemwent,
Sullivan likes the idea of an island for two spaces between the two units
parking, final plans for a
Bill and the Board discussed the amount of review
that would be necessary for this site
due to the fact that it is a split zone lot with both commercial and
residential zones. The Board noted that outside review would probably be necessary with concern
to the runoff and drainage issues only. The Questioned
because it is a split zone lot between residential and commercial, problem in
the commercial zone states that anything besides a single family has to come
before the planning board, what does the board think about that and to what
extreme would the site plan process be, hopin not to go through outside
engineering review for this plan, first paragraph of 7.0, board noted that this
district has had problems and whatever is done on the site needs to deal with
the runoff issues in the area, he is wondering to what
degree of review is needed, board MacMArtin concerned that needs to be reviewed
because of the drainage issues, need outside review maybe just for the
drainage, Fish, worried that this would intentisfy the run off from the BRagdon
property
MacMartin don’t know that we need a full blown
review but do need a review of the drainage issues,
Bill there was a problem because there was an 8”
pipe that was crushed and not taking on water, John put in a 12” culvert that
ends in the same spot and regarded the swale, therefore the back up has been
dealt with,
MacMArtin, on the Bragdon property there is a
twelve “ culvert under the drive and need someone to look at the flow between
tBRagdon and
Board stated that they would send send the materialsthe materials out to the outside firm whom would then produce an estimate and then Meridian could set up
an escrow fund.get an
estimate and an escrow plan will be set up, make sure to get revisions done
first, It was noted that Bill should do his final
revisions before provided plans to be sent for outside review. duplex
building
on
The Board noted lighting had been
added to the plans. They also
discussed access for the existing house, which will be
improved. Setbacks for the
property include residential in the front of the building and commercial in the back. Bill respectfully asked for a waiver of
Section 6.3-g High intensity soil survey.
Spencer –
gravel impervious? – Stever after
gravel is compacted it becomes impervious,
He will do
new drainage calculations and submit new plans for
A MOTION
was made by Alecx
MacMartin and SECONDED by motion to continue this
application to the
March 21st1 meeting,.grant a waiver
for Section 6.3-g High intensity soil survey
Voting: seconded by Fish, 5 7 ayes; motion carried.
A MOTION was
made by Alec MacMartin and SECONDED by Jeff Kandt to accept Site Plan of Land
John E. Kukulka, Jr. Tax Map F Lot 30-2 last revised on 3/01/07.
Voting: 5 ayes; motion
carried.
The Board concluded a site visit was not necessary as members of the Board had been
at this site recently.
A MOTION was made by Alec MacMartin and SECONDED by
Jeff Kandt to approve Site Plan of Land John E. Kukulka, Jr. Tax Map F Lot
30-2 last revised on 3/01/07 with the following condition:
1.) All associated fees have
been paid.
Voting: 5 ayes; motion
carried.
There was no further discussion on the matter.
avan returned to the Board as voting members at 18 p.m.
3.) Subdivision – Dorothy S
McGettigan Revocable Trust – 8:18
Mike Carter, of Todd Land Use Cconsultants, appeared
before the Board explaining that the had an
agreement that Will & Silas hagreement, which stipulated that the 5 acre lot under
discussion is to be broken out between Jim and Elli’s lot and can never be developed, hadad been reviewed by Town Counsel., Mike noted
that there were the agreement is stipulating that the 5 acre lot
that are intended to be broken out between Jim and elli’s lots and can not ever
be developed, no proposed
changes to subdivision plan set. The Board
noted that they
Nneeded to verify with Town
Counsel that he has approved the agreement language. Silas that we are good, no one has walked the
bounds, Matt Fish
volunteered to walk the bounds will do it and follow
through thaton any loose ends
if a conditional approval were to beis given by the
board.Chairman
A MOTION was
made by Alex MacMaArtin and
SECONDED by Dan Donovan Motion that the board chairman is authorized to sign the mylarMylar without further hearing upon completion of on the
condition that the bounds beingare walked, and the language beingis approved by
town counsel for the restrictive easement. and upon satisfaction of these conditions, the board chairman is authorized to sign the mylar
without further hearing
Voting: Dan seconded
7 ayes, motion
carried.Alex MacMartin noted that
the Board, will need
Mylars and some fees to be paid.
4.) Subdivision – E.J. Abbot Trust – Calley and Maple Streets in
Agricultural and Aquifer Protection District. Applicant is proposing to subdivide said lot into
three (3) residential
lots.
8:28
Chairman Dawn Tuomala , of – Monadnock Survey, explained that Town Council’s review
Silas letter mostly spoketalks about the alteration of boundriesboundaries.
She also noted that she added, Nnote 12 which states that the encroachment is only shown for informational purpusesepurposes, and Note 11 concerning Parcel A note 6 changed to incorporate, note 11 added
concerening parcel a,. Also she
changed Note 6. She noted that the Cheneys have
signed the plan, the Board
has the water and sewer orders and the bounds have been set but
not walked., board has
water and sewer orders,
A MOTION was
made by Alex MacMaArtin and
SECONDED by Dan Donoavan to accept
the application.
Voting: 7 ayes; motion carried. Mortion to accept the application Donavan, 7 ayes
The Board opened the floor for public comments and
saw none. Public
comments? None
A MOTION was
made by Alex MacMartin and SECONDED by Dan Donoavan to approve the application Motion to approve conditional of the bounds being
checked.
Voting: MacMartin, 7 ayes; motion carried.,
Dawn submitted Gave mylarsMylar’s to the
Board.
5.) Subdivision - Martha J Greene – Lot B-056 on Curtis Farm Road in the Residential/Agricultural District. Applicant is proposing to subdivide said
lot into three (3) single family residential lots.
Jeff Kandt
stepped off the Board as a voting member at 8:38 p.m.
A MOTION was
made by Dan
Donovan and
SECONDED by Alex MacMartin to continue this item until April 18, 2007. – motion to
continue till April 18, MacMartin 6
ayes, KandtKanst resigned,
Voting: 6 ayes; motion carried.
Jeff Kandt
returned to the Board as a voting member at 8:40 p.Dawn TuomalaToumala, of Monadnock Survey, reappeared before the Board explaining that these
plans were accepted on January 17, 2007, Note 7 has been added to the plans to
explain the extensive waivers as requested by the Board and Jeff Kandt has
walked the bounds.
Waiervs have been granted, since they were
extensive asked to put note on the plan, note 8, Kandt walked the bounds,
accepted on Jan 17
The Board opened the floor for public comment and
saw none.
A MOTION was
made by Dan Donoavan and SECONDED by Alex /MacMartin, moved to approve the plans.
Voting:
Public
comment, none
7 ayes;
motion carried.
New AppicationsApplications:
5.) Cluster Subdivision – First
Light Farm, LLC – Lots F-095-02,03,07,13,14
and 15 on 8:45
Donald Sienkiewicz, member of First Light
Farmthe applicant, introduced Carl, his wife Katea wifeKatea,
Ray Shea , of Sandford Survey , Lucia Kitridg and e, and David ElyEaley
and
Ellen KambolCambpell from Windy
Hill Aassociates appeared before the
Board. They explained they have acquired
Lot F-95-04 and with a lot line adjustment will have
their frontage and right of way. They
are however, requesting a waiver from Section 1.3 of Appendix 1:
Road
Design Standards and Specifications for the length of the road. They are proposing at 1,100-foot road with a
steady 8% grade. They also would like to
determine if this project has a regional impact. The Board concluded there would be a regional
impact.. Lucia
explained the proposed site plan noting that there are ,
Lucia, property is 40.576 acres of land, which
includes 1.2 acres of wetland, steep slopes on the East side and, but a large area
of level terrain at the top of the hill. She
explained that this, proposal includes aning access road up
the slope from Isasac Frye which will , proposinglead to a a loop road with
several clutersclusters on it
for a total of 25 homes. She noted
that there will be 28 acres, or , 75%, of
open space, 28 acres
open, after allowing an for exclusive area for each houses. She
explained that the proposal includes a , sited with
solar, large green in clarge green in
the center which would serve as a community center and
community gardens and also they are, proposing that some of the more
gentle slopes would be cleared to create views and creat meadows. Lucia explained that they are , proposing that
the snow mobile trail would be
rerouted and open for non motorized traffic.
She explained that the loops, perimeter buffer of 105’ which is
double the cluster ordincace, proposing selective clearing on the 15-25,
Hhomes would be primarily detached single
family homes with the possibility, possible a of a few duplex homes and attached garages for each home, however, she noted, this is
subject to change., subject
to change, showing homes with attached garages, could change, intent is to
provide attached garages, proposing community bulding which would be available
for everyone livingin the community,
David ElyEaley, architect at
Wwindy Hhill Aassociates, explained that he had only designed one type of
home so far out of the four or five proposed types of homes. He noted that they
are trying to make the most of the natural elements including solar exposure
and that they are trying to create a community with houses close together and
screened in porches, desgined one home so far, looking to blend with
traditional homes of new England and also the Pine Hill school, unique because
trying to create a community, siting homes very close
together so people can interact with their neighbors as they walk by, screened
in porch, possible solar panel, southern exposure with lots of windows, views
from the sight means views to the sight, tried to keep profile low to blend
with topograohy, lot of thought going into it while keeping
the housing costs low.,
In response to a question from the Board retaining
to lot size, Fish seems
difficult to blend such nce housing with lower income housing,
ElyEaley,
proposing to do a mix,
Fairbank? Everyone with a garage?
ElyEaley-
right now, discussed having a community garage,
MacMArtin, square footage?
ElyEaley-
2350, second largest in the four different kinds
Fish- lot size
Ray Shea stated that they – have notnt done a lot of
engineering at this point., right now not looking at lots rather limited common area,
about 1100 feet East of Abbot Hill and Issac Frye, to 10 acre lots from Four
Corner He explained that this site is made up of six lots
that abut Four Cornerss Farm, made up of 6 lots, access road is the exact
location of the private drive which served the four lots at the top of the
hill, 8% grade to the top of the hill, with the
access road being the o originally private way that leads to the property. He noted that he needs to discuss
with the Board if there is any relief to be found from the standard widths needed for a public access road. designed
in terms of width, need to discuss if there is ant relief from the standar He explained
that they were planning to use three or four septic tanks and two common wells as well as two cisterns , looking
to break up seewarge into every ¾ hours, 2 common wells, fire chief looking for
2 cisterns at the top of the hill have pipes running down and attachinged to hydrants as
requested byut the Fire Chief.that he can pull from it, open space, eliminated road
area and 50 feet from houses, will provide alternate areas for septic but have
not yet,
The Board then had a discussion about density with
a final determination being that the applicants probably would not be able to put any more then 22.5 homes on this site, maybe less. The Board also discussed the issue of the road
width explaining
that for a public road, which fire trucks need to be able to get in and
out of, an absolute minimum width is 18 feet is needed but with careful geographic planning a country look
could be retained. The Board also suggested that the applicants review the
Riverwalk subdivision minutes.MacMartin:
#9 look at what was there in 1989, which was one lot, so there is already
development on the original parcel, if it had held together as a large lot it
would have been 25% density but now since it has already been subdivided the
density is 12.5%, the original subdivision would have supported 6 houses, but
this proposal would mean a 400% increase. The idea of the ordinance was that if
you were to keep the original plot intack one received more of a bonus, it
would be a consolidation of lots and then it would be a condimunimum complex,
Fairbank – seems that this would be in the spirit
of the cluter ordinances,
Open space would be available to everyone in the
town, the central green would be mostly for residents but all the open space
and foot trails would be open to the public
Issues – read through the cluster regulations and
the subdivision regulations, road should be 600’ but is 1100’ , would like to
keep the roads as narrow as possible so people want to drive slowly and kids
can be safe,
A MOTION
was made by Alex MacMartincontinue this matter to the Board, the road would become the a town road,
Would not
qualify for the road right now but foresees waivers needed down the road,
Why does it
have to be a public road?
MacMArtin:
because of the people running in and out, because
Have to be
concerned about a fire truck getting in and out, 18 feet is the absolute
minimum, would need packed shoulders, can accomplish a country looking road
with geographic planning,
Spencer
noted that 84 houses
Delia
Windwalk Burns hill road
Currently
they could have 20 houses with a potential of 22 houses but there are a number
of requirements that havt o be met
Suggest
that the Riverwalk minutes,
Riverwalk,
Highfields, Orchard Fields,
Motion to continue, to March 21, 2007 meeting.find the application under RSA 36:54 to
58 Regional Impact and to notify the
Voting: 7 ayes, motion
carried.
Donald confirmed utilities for
the road would be underground.
He also stated they would be limiting trees along the road
side for safety. He hopes to gain
the Fire
Chief’s support on their request for an 18’ wide
road. The Board stated not only would
utilities and trees be factors but life safety is also an is
A MOTION was made by
Voting: 6 ayes; 1
abstention; motion carried.
Don respectfully requested a continuance to the
April meeting.
A MOTION was made by Alec
MacMartin and SECONDED by Dan
Voting: 7 ayes; motion
carried.
There was no further discussion on the matter. MacMartin/Faiman, 7 aye
Sign
Applications- 9:45
8.) Pike
Industries – Sign application to permit the placement of an
off-premises sign for Pike Industries at the corner of Isaac Frye Highway and
Forest Road on Lot B-147, 462 Forest Road.
-
The applicant was not present.
A MOTION was made by Alex MacMartin and SECONDED by
Neil Faiman to continue the matter.
Voting: 7 ayes, motion carried.no one present, MacMartin stated that he agreed to
move the sign back 15 feet,, MacMArtin continue Faiman, 7 ayes
9.) Jill Murray – Sign
Application to permit the placement of a sign Main Street.
The applicant was not n present.
A MOTION was made by Dan Donavan and SECONDED by
Alex MacMartin to continue the matter,
Voting: 7 ayes, motion carried. Donavan.MacMArtin
coniure
Pre-Applications
10.) Amber &
Wendell Fisk – Sugar House Proposal for Lot F-021, Route 101
The applicants were not not prpresent.
6.) 11.) Craig
Checani – Site Plan Review – F-017 40 West Intervale Road in the
Industrial and Acquifer Districts.
Applicant is proposing a change of use to an office.
requesting a
waiver on a site plan,
This applicant
is requesting that the Board approve the application for a one man office with
no more then three cars for sale at a time. The Board discussed that this site
is in the aquifer district and that the applicant may have difficulty getting the
application approved due to the possible leakage of car fluids. The applicant
noted that he is attempting to get a minor dealers license from the state. The Board explained that they
could easily approve the application without the cars present but they were
unsure if this would meet the applicant’s needs for
the state. They did however
state that they would be inclined to accept the less formal plans as long as he
included the nature of the business and hours on the drawing and had a separate application
for the signage.Craig and Sue Checani reappeared
with revised plans for their site plan of
The Board stated Section 8.2.4 Setbacks would need to
be met, therefore, parking area B would need to be relocated to the Northwest
back corner of the property.
Craig
concluded he had a service agreement with Medlyn Motor, Inc.
The Board
asked Craig to revise his hours to be in compliance
with the State Guidelines of remaining open for 37.5 hours a week and to
include the setback lines on revised drawings with new location of parking area
B.
Craig agreed
to return to the
7.) Good News
Bible Church – Site Plan
application Lot F-012-01 – 27 Hutchinson Road in the Industrial, Acquifer and
Wetlands Districts. Applicant
is
proposing an addition to the building and parking lot.
The Board asked
for the seating counts to be checked.
A MOTION was made by Alec MacMartin and
SECONDED by
Voting:
7 ayes; motion carried.
Smack down in the aquifer district and worries
about car leakage,
Questions of vehicles on site? Only three cars to
public at any given time, not going to wash the car, doubt he would have more
then one vehicle at a time, needs approval to use it as a base, not planning on
opening a auto shop and washing and waxing cars,
\
If all you were asking for was to have your office
in that building then that would probably be okay, but your asking to have cars
on the property, the department of safety requires that you are approved for
zoning
Could turn in a drawing 22 days before next months
meeting ans state what you are going to be doing in that office, and state that
you will not have cars for sale on site,
The regulations do not say anything about car
sales, however it would require a closer space,
The board stated that the board would be inclined
to accept the less than professional application,
Nature of business, and hours on the drawings,
separate application for signage,
8.) 0:10 Provost 1993 Trust – Dawn TuomalaToumala, Fish steped back
Attorney
Robert V. McKenney, McKenney & Bausha, P.C.,
appeared before the Board for acceptance and approval for a proposed road and
subdivision along the
As the
applicant is pending a ZBA special exception for a proposed 9,544-ft wetland
disturbance over 3 locations in
The Board noted both egresses
from the proposed road are in Lyndeborough but go
through
Attorney
McKenney informed the Board the Town of
Brendan
Philbrick, resident of Lyndeborough and taxpayer of
A MOTION was made by
Voting:
5 ayes; motion carried.
A MOTION was made by
Voting:
5 ayes; motion carried.
Attorney
McKenney thanked the Board for their time.
There was no further discussion on the matter.
At this point in time, Chairman
The application will get noticed,
Issues, concerens? Can she give the easement to
Carla to get sent out to legal?
9.)
Joseph M. Wichert – Subdivision application for
Joseph Wichert appeared before
the Board with plans of his duplex. He
stated he is waiting for the fire chief’s and the State of
The
Board also asked the parking for Units A and B be
included on the plans. They also
requested the common area and utilities are included along with maintenance of
the well. They concluded they would like
to see setbacks for the decks.
A MOTION was made by Alec MacMartin and
SECONDED by
Voting:
6 ayes; motion carried.
Joseph
thanked the Board for their time. There
was no further discussion on the matter.
A MOTION
was made by Dan Donavan and SECONDED by Alec MacMartin Dogs? It was reported to police, not against
ordinance, he indicated that he was raising the dogs for his own show, but now
there is a website, and he will get to the police after checking it out.
Motion to
adjourn the meeting at
Voting: 6 ayes; motion carried.
Minutes respectfully submitted by:
Carla
J. Walter
Selectmen’s
Assistant
<Back
to Planning Board Home Page>, Donavan/MacMartin 10:56